Research insights · Feedback & growth
A place to begin
Kluger and DeNisi’s meta-analysis combined 607 effect sizes. Feedback improved performance on average, yet more than one-third of the interventions reduced performance. Their explanation considers where feedback directs attention.
Examine the direction of attention, not just the average
A positive average did not mean every intervention helped. The authors proposed that effectiveness can weaken as attention shifts away from the task and toward self-related concerns. This offers a reason to examine the experience created by a message.
In your own conversation, ask what the person heard. “How did you understand what I was trying to share?” can help reveal a gap between your intended message and their experience. Listen before correcting their interpretation or explaining your intention again.
Separate a judgment from an observed action
Take “You need to be more responsible” and return to a particular scene. What information was not shared, by when, and whose preparation was affected? The aim is to describe something that both people can examine rather than a verdict about the person.
Being concrete need not mean abandoning care. You can acknowledge your concern for the relationship while making an expectation visible. Distinguish the necessary work standard from language that decides the person’s value or character.
Leave room for the other person to understand the event
You might use SBI to organize the situation, observed behavior and impact, then ask what was happening from their side. What do you not yet know? After asking, leave enough space for thinking instead of immediately attaching your recommendation.
The standard can remain clear while you listen. Hearing a perspective does not require excusing harmful behavior or removing accountability. It helps both people examine what happened and what a different action would require in the actual circumstances.
Invite the person’s next choice before supplying one
Ask what they might try next and identify one real situation together. Discuss the information, resources or practice opportunity needed. An agreement is more useful when both people understand what will make the action possible.
At follow-up, ask about difficulties and learning as well as completion. Recognize a strength or contribution evident in a specific action. That gives room to discuss what the person wants to carry forward alongside what needs to change.
What HR can notice about quality and conditions
Alongside counting conversations, explore what the colleague understood and could try afterward. Ask whether the leader had time to prepare a difficult message and return to it. The conditions around a conversation deserve attention too.
This week, note the words you used and the person’s response in one exchange. Choose one reflection: did I describe an action, ask about something I did not know, or hear the person’s next choice? One honest observation is enough to begin.
Connecting the research with coaching
A coaching application is to explore whether a message invites learning about a specific action or draws the person into defending their worth. That question can help a leader prepare a more concrete conversation.
What to keep in view
The analysis spans varied tasks and feedback interventions. It does not mean that one-third of all workplace conversations fail, nor does it directly validate SBI or a particular coaching method.
Original research and source
Avraham N. Kluger & Angelo DeNisi (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
Read the primary research record ↗Questions about this topic
Can feedback reduce performance?
The meta-analysis included interventions with lower performance, so the presence of feedback alone is not a reason to assume benefit.
Does SBI always make feedback effective?
Here SBI is a preparation aid. Understanding, work conditions and follow-up support still need to be explored.
Should I avoid difficult feedback?
Prepare a concrete discussion of the standard, behavior and impact while leaving room for the person’s perspective and next attempt.

